JBCR Navigation
Publication Ethics
Call For Paper
Editorial Board
Guide to Authors
Editorial Workflow
Submit Manuscript
Viewing Options
[View Abstract]
[View Full Text PDF]
[Download Full Text PDF]
Authors Articles on Google Scholar
Brian K. Reilly
Vincent R. Nyirenda
Harry N. Chabwela
Willem J. Myburgh
Andrew I. Phiri
Authors Articles on Pubmed
Brian K. Reilly
Vincent R. Nyirenda
Harry N. Chabwela
Willem J. Myburgh
Andrew I. Phiri
Email this Article to a friend
Print this Article
Viewed: 411
Forwarded: 0
Printed: 145
Downloaded: 971
Browse Journals By Category
Agricultural Sciences
Biological Sciences
Legal Studies
Medical Sciences
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences

Newsletters Subscription

Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation Research

Full Length Research Paper 

Wildlife crop damage valuation and conservation: conflicting perception by local farmers in the Luangwa Valley, eastern Zambia 

Vincent R. Nyirenda, Willem J. Myburgh, Brian K. Reilly, Andrew I. Phiri and Harry N. Chabwela 

1Department of Nature Conservation, Faculty of Science, Tshwane University of Technology, Private Bag X680, Pretoria, South Africa.

2Directorate of Research, Planning, Information and Veterinary Services, Zambia Wildlife Authority, Private Bag 1, Kafue Rd., Chilanga, Zambia. 

3Directorate of Conservation and Management, Zambia Wildlife Authority, Private Bag 1, Kafue Rd., Chilanga, Zambia.

4Department of Biological Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia.

*Corresponding author. E-mail: nyirendavr@hotmail.com 

Accepted 16 August, 2013 

Wildlife conservation in Luangwa Valley depends on perception by local communities, and is affected by wildlife crop raiding. Perception of local farmers were elucidated between 2006/7 and 2008/9 farming seasons. Data collection was done using prescribed forms and semi-structured questionnaires by trained field assistants. The case study findings confirm that firstly, perceived and actual crop losses differed by 49.49 and 7.78% for mono-specific stands of maize and cotton, respectively. Secondly, opportunity costs incurred and perceived by local farmers were higher than direct costs. Most farmers (79.83%, n = 95) associated opportunity costs of wildlife crop damage with loss of sleep and loss of time for other chores, when providing crop protection. Thirdly, conservation objectives and local farmers’ needs and aspirations were antithetical. Majority of local farmers (82.59%, n = 204) expanded or segregated crop fields, thereby degrading wildlife habitats. Ensuing negative perception posed high risks to wildlife conservation in Luangwa Valley. Incentivising performance conservation payments to local farmers are recommended, to increase their tolerance levels while incurring costs of living with wildlife. Implementation of improved environmental education and awareness creation, coupled with capacity building through appropriate trainings and facilitated infrastructure in resolving human-wildlife conflicts are critical. 

Key words: Wildlife crop raiding, contingent valuation, opportunity costs, conservation, Luangwa Valley.