GJSES Navigation
About
Publication Ethics
Call For Paper
Editorial Board
Guide to Authors
Scope
Editorial Workflow
Submit Manuscript
Archives
Viewing Options
[View Abstract]
[View Full Text PDF]
[Download Full Text PDF]
Authors Articles on Google Scholar
T Eyengho
O Fawole
Authors Articles on Pubmed
T Eyengho
O Fawole
Preferences
Email this Article to a friend
Print this Article
Statistics
Viewed: 338
Forwarded: 0
Printed: 150
Downloaded: 955
Browse Journals By Category
Agricultural Sciences
Biological Sciences
Education
Engineering
Legal Studies
Medical Sciences
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences

Newsletters Subscription

Global Journal of Special Education and Services

Global Journal of Special Education and Services 

ISSN: xxxx-xxxx Vol. 1 (1),

pp. 008-015, November, 2013. ©

Global Science Research Journals

 

Full Length Research Paper

Effectiveness of indirect and direct metalinguistic error correction techniques on the essays of senior secondary school students in South Western Nigeria

T Eyengho and O Fawole

1Department of Special Education and Curriculum Studies, Adeyemi College of Education, Ondo, Ondo State, Nigeria. 2Department of Special Education and Curriculum Studies,School of Education, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria.

*Corresponding author: E-mail: ajibisi@yahoo.com.

Accepted 10 July, 2013

The study assessed error-correction techniques used in correcting students’ essays in English language and also determined the effects of these strategies and other related variables on students’ performance in essay writing with a view to improving students’ writing skill in English language in South Western Nigeria. A quasi-experimental design was adopted for the study. The sample comprised of 180 SSII students who were randomly selected. The students were assigned to experimental groups: Indirect techniques (68), direct metalinguistic (63) and the control group (65). The results showed that the indirect approach was the most effective (x=11.88) compared to the direct metalinguistic technique (x=11.53) and the conventional method (x=10.4), F (2,177)=7.12, p<0.05. In conclusion, the implications of the findings are discussed.

Key words: Error correction, indirect technique, direct metalinguistic, technique, academic ability, gender.