GJSES Navigation
About
Publication Ethics
Call For Paper
Editorial Board
Guide to Authors
Scope
Editorial Workflow
Submit Manuscript
Archives
Viewing Options
[View Abstract]
[View Full Text PDF]
[Download Full Text PDF]
Authors Articles on Google Scholar
Zeleha Zamani
Authors Articles on Pubmed
Zeleha Zamani
Preferences
Email this Article to a friend
Print this Article
Statistics
Viewed: 103
Forwarded: 0
Printed: 32
Downloaded: 176
Browse Journals By Category
Agricultural Sciences
Biological Sciences
Education
Engineering
Legal Studies
Medical Sciences
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences

Newsletters Subscription

Global Journal of Special Education and Services

ISSN:  2465-7212  Vol. 5 (1), pp. 067-076, January, 201

 

Review

 

Insolvability of the Problem of Demarcation

 

Zeleha Zamani

 

Accepted 2 November 2016

The demarcation problem, a term coined by Karl Popper, refers to the problem of determining the nature of the criteria that should be implemented to establish the boundaries between science and non-science. Throughout this paper we will use this term in the more restrictive sense as the problem of determining the boundary between science and religion. The efforts to elucidate a solution to this problem usually place scholars into two incongruous extremes. The prevalent stance is not only that this boundary exists, but that it is definable, insurmountable, and impermeable. Some hold the exact opposite view and reject the idea that such a demarcation is, in fact, extant. A third alternative was offered by some philosophers of science of twentieth century such as Lakatos, Feyerabend and the epistemological anarchists that the problem of demarcation is, in fact, irresolvable. We do concur with their claim, and offer a logical proof that the existence or nonexistence of such a boundary is, ultimately, indeterminable. We start out by giving a brief history of the conflict between religion and science. We follow this by a condensed account of how the scientific process is delineated in various philosophies of science. We conclude by addressing the issue of demarcation and its insolvability.

Key words: Science, religion, epistemology, demarcation