GJAEE Navigation
About
Publication Ethics
Call For Paper
Editorial Board
Guide to Authors
Scope
Editorial Workflow
Submit Manuscript
Archives
Viewing Options
[View Abstract]
[View Full Text PDF]
[Download Full Text PDF]
Authors Articles on Google Scholar
Marco Van Mata
Heike Ruud Cruyff
Johan Robin Piet
Authors Articles on Pubmed
Marco Van Mata
Heike Ruud Cruyff
Johan Robin Piet
Preferences
Email this Article to a friend
Print this Article
Statistics
Viewed: 110
Forwarded: 0
Printed: 83
Downloaded: 178
Browse Journals By Category
Agricultural Sciences
Biological Sciences
Education
Engineering
Legal Studies
Medical Sciences
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences

Newsletters Subscription

Global Journal of Agricultural Economics and Econometrics

ISSN: 2408-5499 Vol. 4 (5), pp. 247-255, May, 2016. 

 

Full Length Research Paper

 

Estimating the impact of a food security program by propensity-score matching

 

Marco Van Mata*, Heike Ruud Cruyff and Johan Robin Piet

 

Accepted 20 May, 2016

Reducing poverty and improving household food security remains an important policy objective for rural development in the semi-arid areas of many countries in Africa. Many development programs have been introduced in efforts to bring the cycle of poverty and food insecurity to an end. This paper investigates the impact of a food security package (FSP) program in improving rural household’s food consumption in Tigray region, Northern Ethiopia. An empirical analysis based on a propensity score matching (PSM) method, which is a popular approach to estimate causal treatment effects, is employed. Using kernel-matching estimation technique, program beneficiaries were matched with non-beneficiaries. The results show that the program has had a significant effect on improving household food calorie intake. The findings indicated that the program raised the food calorie intake of beneficiary households by 41.8% above that of individuals not involved in the program. Sensitivity analysis also indicated that the observed estimate of impact is not vulnerable to hidden bias or selection on unobservables.

Key words: Propensity score, matching, selectivity bias, average treatment effect, impact, evaluation.